Tag: history

  • Surrender as Paradox

    Masculinity and femininity are not cages. They are archetypes. They are currents. You do not have to be a man to flow in masculine energy. You do not have to be a woman to flow in feminine. These are maps, not mandates.

    The modern world teaches us to name, to limit, to box. They build empires on fear, guilt, and obedience. They call it virtue. They call it love. They cage the soul and call it salvation. But the Tao whispers: It is and it is not. It slips through fingers, yet runs through your veins. It is the paradox of living fully, of embracing contradiction.

    You walk into shadow, not out of sin but out of curiosity. Pleasure is ritual. Indulgence is liturgy. Hedonism, taboo, debauchery—these are altars. Each gasp, each tremor, each whispered yes—a prayer written in flesh. Plant medicines, shrooms, entheogens—they open corridors of mind, gates to ecstasy, doorways where the self dissolves and the divine bleeds through muscle, bone, and blood.

    Masculinity is fire, motion, structure, force. Feminine energy births, guides, nurtures, flows. Archetypes are currents, not cages. The wound of fathers, the pain of inherited expectation—acknowledge it. But do not let it dictate your devotion. Brotherhood, communion, consent, accountability—these are your rituals. Pain is fuel, but not excuse. Desire is guide, not theft.

    The Tao is paradox. Pleasure and pain. Surrender and control. Chaos and structure. Shadow and radiance. Life and death. There is no either/or. There is only AND. Sacred kink, conscious ritual, intentional embodiment—these are the crucibles where paradox becomes revelation. Breath, sensation, trust—they are the path, the Way, the alchemy of living fully.

    The Way cannot be held, but it can be walked. The truth cannot be named, but it can be felt. It is invisible, inaudible, subtle. It is and. The sacred, the taboo, the ecstasy—they are not separate from spirit; they are the gates. Pleasure is meditation. Desire is devotion. Shadow is sacred.

    When nothing is done, nothing is left undone. Let the paradox bind you, guide you, teach you. Step fully into the shadow. Embrace the fire. Revel in the forbidden. Surrender. Indulge. Explore. Touch. Be.

    This is your altar. This is your communion. This is your liberation.

  • Follow The Bread Crumbs Back To The Circle

    There was a time when the world was not divided—when spirit and matter, love and healing, the living and the dead, were nearly undistigushable. In the Dagara world, this unity is not myth but a reality. The material is simply the skin of the invisible; what we call the “supernatural” is nothing more than the deeper part of the natural world. Ancestors walk among us. Rivers speak. Trees listen. Ritual is not an event but life itself.

    From birth, each person carries a unique “genius,” a purpose breathed into them by the Other World. Names are a reminders of that destiny. And community exists to safeguard the chosen. To forget or worst never learn your genius is to weaken the whole community. In this way, individuality and community are not opposed; the singular gift of each person is the cornerstone of our survival.

    Nature, in this worldview, is not scenery or resource. It is the first book, the first teacher, the first home. Its remedies do not only cure the body but restore the mind. To be cut off from nature is to be cut off from healing. Reconciliation with nature is reconciliation with ourselves.

    Ritual, then, is the technology of the invisible. It is how a community repairs the web of connection—between people, between worlds, between elements. Unlike the rigid ceremonies of modern religions, Rituals are alive, tailored to the wound at hand. It bends with grief, laughter, anger, or celebration, channeling energies too subtle for perception. Ritual is how a community remembers itself.

    And yet, this remembering is fragile. Knowledge in the village is guarded, not hoarded. What is sacred must be revealed at the right time, to the right person, in the right way, or it risks becoming powerless or harmful. To know is to recall what was already within.

    This stands in stark contrast to much of Western life, where knowledge is accumulation, love is possession, healing is symptom management, and community is we just go here.


    For the Dagara, love is not private. It is spiritual and communal, woven into the obligations of ancestors and community. Intimacy is not simply pleasure—it is power, to channel spirit. Marriage is notjust a couple’s affair but a oath to the village itself, binding families and tribes for future trials. Elders ensure that unions are aligned with purpose and energy.

    Compare this to Western societies, where—as Erich Fromm and bell hooks observe—love often collapses under the weight of the individual. Love is mistaken for cathexis, the temporary intoxication of infatuation, rather than practiced as “the will to nurture our own and another’s spiritual growth.” Patriarchy trains men to avoid vulnerability and women to endure abuse. Consumerism co-opts spiritual hunger, selling “self-love” while starving us of communion. There is a longing for love, but also a fear of it this is our crisis of faith.

    , as Lee Harrington writes,Kink communities attempt to build “tribes of the heart” where negotiation, consent, and radical honesty about needs become sacred practices in themselves. Here, love is not assumed but constructed through dialogue. It is not perfect, but it is intentional. In their rituals—munches, play parties, collaring ceremonies—we glimpse a yearning for communal intimacy that echoes indigenous wisdom, refracted through an erotic lens.


    For the Dagara, illness is not a biological glitch but a fracture in relationship. To heal is to mend connections—with community, with nature, with Spirit, with self. Community is the tool that loosens the grip of ego, shakes free what has calcified, and restores flow. Grief is not hidden but shared, for communal grieving is food for the soul. Healing is less about “fixing” than remembering.

    Western healing, by contrast, often isolates. Therapy can be profound, but it is privatized, pathologized, and often stripped of spiritual practices. Grief is silenced or rushed; illness is reduced to symptoms; loneliness is epidemic. The hunger grows, yet yet you feeds it empty calories. As Scott Peck noted, true healing requires discipline and communion—yet Western culture trains us to seek quick fixes, not deep chages.

    Again, kink offers an alternate path. Scenes are often framed as “play,” not work: confronting fears, releasing trauma, exploring shadow, achieving catharsis. Like ritual, kink manipulates subtle energies, shaping altered states of consciousness. It can be profoundly healing when practiced with care. Though rooted in Western contexts, it resonates with the indigenous truth that healing is communal, embodied, and spiritual.


    The Dagara teach that community is not optional; it is the very condition of human life. The entire village raises each child meaning that your child might sleep in any home in the village, that you might go weeks with interacting and yet know that they are safe and cared for, ensuring their gift is heard and honored. Elders anchor the tribe with memory and wisdom, while mentors nurse the spirits of the young. Conflicts are not disruptions in the community but messages from Spirit, to be resolved for the sake of all. Community is abundance—not in accumulation, but in fullness of connection with one another and with the earth.

    Western culture, on the other hand, prizes the individual above us all. Isolation is epidemic. The nuclear family, far from being ideal, even has fractured under capitalism, leaving many adrift. Elders, feared as reminders of death, are hidden away, stripping society of wisdom. Progress is linear, technology destructive, speed a sign of spiritual collaspe. And yet, beneath all this, there is yearning—a hunger for belonging, for tribe, for home.

    In this yearning, kink communities again serve as a mirror. They craft chosen families, create rituals of gathering, and strive for inclusivity. They are not utopias—conflict, drama, and exploitation exist—but they hold space for radical honesty, vulnerability, and shared identity. In their best moments, they echo what Sobonfu Somé calls the “spirit of intimacy,” where connection itself becomes sacred.


    What emerges from this tapestry is not nostalgia for an idealized past, nor condemnation of the West, but a bridge. As Malidoma Patrice Somé argued, indigenous wisdom is for museums it’s medicine. Westerners are spiritually hungry, emotionally starved, and communally fragmented. Indigenous traditions remind us that purpose is not invented but remembered; that love is not a feeling but a practice; that healing is not fix but a choice; that community is not a lifestyle but a condition for survival.

    Even within the West, subcultures like kink show that another way is possible. They reclaim intimacy as intentional practice, ritualize communal gatherings, and insist on consent and transparency as cornerstones of relationship. While not identical to indigenous forms, they demonstrate a deep human impulse: to belong, to heal, to love, to remember.


    Conclusion

    The bread crumbs point the same way: toward intentional communities that prioritize growth over ridicule, acceptance over blame, rememberance over punishment.

    The lesson is the same: we are not meant to live alone. Our purpose is to each other. Healing is communal. Love is the will to nurture growth. Spirit is here in every moment, every action, every touch, every ritual, every breath.

    A community committed to growth does not tear down indivual in the name of purity or ideology. It understands conflict as a chance to deepen connection rather than sever it. To ridicule or exile is easy. To call in—to say, I see you, I see the harm, and I want us both to grow—is harder. This shift is essential if we are to build communities that do not replicate the same domination, punishment, and disposability we came to escape.

    The rope, the flogger, the collar are all can be tools for healing, remembrance, and ecstatic communion. These spaces echo the Dagara’s ritual circles, arenas where we purge pain, confront fear, and taste freedom together. When kink transcends performance and becomes devotion, it is indistinguishable from prayer.

    Non-monogamy when rooted in respect, honesty, and care are not threats to community but expansions of it. They can become vehicles for abundance instead of scarcity, generosity instead of jealousy, connection instead of competition. Pleasure is shared, intimacy is sacred and these are not spaces of fracture but whole.

    We must break from ideologies that serve power, image, or ego, and return to practices that serve Spirit, healing, and growth. Choosing practice over posture. Love, healing, community, and kink are not slogans—they are labors of devotion.

    Building cultures of trust. we must create spaces where hiding is unnecessary, where truth can be spoken without fear—not masked by ominous catch-all terms like “consent violation” or “harm.”

    Honoring elders and mentors. Communities cannot thrive without wisdom keepers, guides, and midwives of the Spirit.

    Ritualizing our connections. Whether through kink scenes, communal meals, or healing circles, ritual transforms the ordinary into the sacred.

    Centering Spirit and respect. Every encounter—sexual, communal, or conflictual—is a chance to honor the divine in one another.

    What lies on the other side of this path is not utopia, but fullness: communities where each person’s genius is recognized; relationships where respect and devotion are more powerful than possession; kink circles where energy, eros, and ritual are woven to heal and uplift; non-monogamous constellations where love is abundant, not scarce.

    This is a vision of better sacred communities: not dominated by shame or fear, not fractured by ideology, but alive with Spirit, love, and the ecstatic pulse of collective life.

    It is not a dream of perfection—it is a call to practice.
    To love. To heal. To remember.

  • Finished The Art of Loving by Erich Fromm Review

    A Masterclass in Emotional and Intellectual Dragging. Let me tell you something: this book hit. Hard. I picked up The Art of Loving by Erich Fromm thinking I was about to get some soft, philosophical musings on romance and relationships. What I got instead was a complete philosophical takedown of society, ego, capitalism, and our inability to connect. Fromm doesn’t just explain love — he dissects it, deconstructs it, demands better from us. And he does it all with the most elegant, intellectual side-eye I’ve ever read.

    The tone? Everything.

    It’s like watching someone set up dominoes — precise, methodical — and then knock them down one by one until suddenly you’re left staring at the last one, trembling. And that last domino is you.

    Fromm builds to this absolutely chilling indictment of modern society:

    “Our society is run by a managerial bureaucracy… man is an automaton—well fed, well clad, but without any ultimate concern for that which is his peculiarly human quality and function… If it is true… that love is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problem of human existence, then any society which excludes… the development of love, must in the long run perish of its own contradiction.”

    Read that again. That’s not a quote, that’s A warning.

    Fromm breaks down why love is missing in the modern world — how we’ve confused love with consumerism, performance, control. He talks about why we don’t know how to love, how it all got tangled up in the machinery of profit and productivity, and why learning to love is not just cute or noble — it’s essential to our very humanity.

    And the way he says it? Impeccable.
    There is shade in every sentence. It’s not preachy — it’s precise. It’s like being read for filth by someone in a velvet smoking jacket, sipping wine, quoting Hegel, and daring you to catch up. It’s the politest, nastiest intellectual takedown I’ve ever read. A masterclass in soft-spoken audacity.

    The tone is calm but cutting. Thoughtful but brutal. High-key shade on every page. There’s a scoff baked into every sentence. I swear, I could hear the arched eyebrow.

    And yet… underneath all of it is this beautiful, radical, sincere hope. A belief that love can be cultivated. That we can unlearn this disconnection. That society can be reshaped in the image of true love — not the romanticized fluff we’re sold, but the real, difficult, honest kind rooted in care, discipline, humility, and commitment.

    I took so many notes. My notes are chaos. My brain is cooked.

    And let’s talk about that last chapter — the one I will be re-reading every month until further notice. It cracked me wide open. If you talk to me anytime soon, be warned: I will be quoting this book like scripture. I see why bell hooks cited it in All About Love.

    10/10, no notes. Except, you know, the entire notebook I filled.

  • Language vs. Reality: A Conversation on Thought, Culture, and the Limits of Words

    Language was built by ancient minds drawn toward fixed ideas—stability, constants, categories, and quick solutions. But the world language tries to describe is change, growth, complexity, and connection. This mismatch creates a gap between lived reality and the rigid thought structures we often use to interpret it.

    In a recent discussion, several voices came together to explore how language shapes thought—and how thought, in turn, shapes language. Here’s how it unfolded:

    @transbuoy offered a compelling starting point:

    “I don’t think it’s language doing this directly—it’s our minds that want to fix some things as unchanging. A static concept is easier to hold than a dynamic one. But of course, everything is changing at different rates—including language itself.

    Descriptive language always comes after the thing it’s describing. It’s the signifier, not the signified.”

    This opened the door to deeper cultural and linguistic questions.

    @CraigJustCraig responded with a cultural lens:

    “I see your point, but I’m approaching this from the angle that not all languages work like English. Especially non-colonial languages—they don’t impose the same rigid structures we see in American English.

    Our dominant language reflects a cultural mindset that codes time as linear, progress as staged, and reality as something to categorize. This supports a worldview that craves order and rationality, but it limits how we perceive the fluidity of existence.”

    @transbuoy agreed and added:

    “I don’t know much about American culture specifically, but colonial culture, yes—language becomes a tool of control, narrower than its potential.”

    The conversation deepened when @LadyJouissance stepped in:

    “Ah, the classic chicken-and-egg of linguistic structuralism—does language shape our thoughts, or do our thoughts shape language?

    I highly recommend Ferdinand de Saussure and Claude Levi-Strauss on this.”

    To which @CraigJustCraig replied:

    “Cooking through Levi-Strauss now—I’ll add Saussure to the mix!”

    @LadyJouissance followed up with a personal insight:

    “I’ve always wondered how my thinking would be different if I’d grown up speaking Mandarin.

    Language influences our thought patterns, but I don’t believe it’s an inescapable cage—just one most people don’t even know they’re in.

    I also believe there are thought processes that happen outside of language. We fixate on language because it’s our bridge to each other. And tracking how meanings shift over time is fascinating—like how ‘sick’ went from bad to good.”

    @CraigJustCraig responded with depth:

    “Yes—breaking free from language’s limitations takes awareness and effort. Much of dominant-language structure discourages self-awareness and conditions people to obey authority. It moralizes needs, labels people, and distracts from empathy and responsibility.

    I often wonder about the thoughts I never had—blocked by inherited language and cultural conditioning. What kind of mental landscape could we have grown into with a completely different linguistic foundation?”

    @LadyJouissance added a philosophical twist:

    “One of my favorite critiques comes from Nietzsche, who challenged Descartes’ ‘cogito ergo sum’ by pointing out that some languages—like Swahili—don’t even require a subject for a verb.

    Just because something is thinking doesn’t prove a ‘self’ exists. It really baked my noodle to realize how deeply language frames our sense of reality.

    The answer? Widen the world you inhabit. It makes breaking free a little easier.”

    @transbuoy chimed in again to affirm:

    “Absolutely—language and reality shape each other. I’ll still check out the book though 😄”

    Closing Reflection
    The power of language is that it both reflects and refracts reality. When we change the language we use—not just the words, but the structure and metaphors—we begin to change how we see, feel, and connect. The world isn’t static, and neither are we. Our evolution begins when we learn to speak not just about change—but in it.